August 2014
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

News Categories

Site search

More About The Peru Gazette

The editor is John Ryan at email: perugazette@gmail.com. The Peru Gazette is a free community, education and information website. It is non-commercial and does not accept paid advertising.

Comment Policy

The Peru Gazette welcomes comments on posted stories. The author MUST include his/her first and last name. No  foul or libelous language permitted. The Peru Gazette reserves the right to not publish a comment.

Recent Comments

Peru Town Court Hours Change and Temporary Pay Raise for Judge Denied

By John T. Ryan

“It’s a space issue, isn’t it?” remarked Peru Town Attorney Donald Biggs at the Peru Town Board’s August 25, 2014 meeting following a contentious discussion between town counselors and Judge James Kirby. The counselors voted to change the time Peru Town Court convenes disagreeing with the points made by Judge Kirby. A temporary pay increase for Judge Kirby was also on the Board’s agenda. The increase was not approved.

Peru Town Court proceedings have been convening at 2 p.m. with defendants, attorneys and family members often entering the room at about 1:30 p.m. At the same time, members of the public come into the Town Hall to pay water/sewer bills, taxes or to transact other business. Some residents have been uncomfortable when they have encountered inmates in handcuffs and town employees have had to contend with court being conducted just a few feet from their workspace. Changing the time when court convenes has been discussed in the past but no action was taken previously because Peru’s Court is held at the same time as the Town of Plattsburgh Court. According to Judge Kirby some attorneys represent clients in both courts and convening court at 2 p.m. was begun to assist them. Attorneys typically come to Peru first and then go to the Town of Plattsburgh to represent other clients.

Supervisor Glushko suggested convening court at 3 or 3:30 p.m. Judge Kirby responded that the August 25th meeting was the first time he had heard about the Board’s concern about court hours. He said convening court at 2 p.m. has worked well and that a later start time could mean court ending at 9 p.m. or later. After some discussion the Board decided the Court would convene at 3:30 p.m. for a two-month trial period. Kirby told the Board that in the future he wanted to be directly informed of any matters concerning his office.

A second spirited discussion involved a proposed local law which would have given Judge Kirby a 50% temporary pay raise for the period October 1, 2014 to December 31st. Kirby has been handling all the judicial workload since Judge Jack Lawliss’ July 21st resignation. On July 28th the Board passed a resolution granting Kirby the 50% increase effective August 1st only to later discover that passage of a local law would be required. Judge Kirby has been of the opinion that since he has been handling the workload of two judges, he should receive proportional compensation.

Counselor Kregg Bruno commented that when the Board agreed to a 50% pay raise Kirby reduced the number of weekly court sessions from four to two and he didn’t believe an increase was warranted. Kirby responded, “I don’t get paid enough to hold court four nights a month. It’s not about court nights, it’s about workload.” (Kirby’s pay is $17,401 per year). Kirby mentioned that in addition to holding court he conducts many arraignments and reviews hundreds of tickets. Kirby finally said to the Board, “Do what you want to do!” Counselors noted many of Kirby’s arraignments are being done as a courtesy to the State Police and that many arraignments involve crimes committed in the Town of Plattsburgh, which does not extend the same courtesy to State Police. When the pay raise came to vote counselors McBrayer, Bruno, Douglass and Supervisor Glushko voted no. (Counselor McDonald was excused from the meeting.)

During the public comment portion of the meeting and after Judge Kirby had left the meeting, Court Clerk Holly Stone stated that the reduction from four to two court sessions had been planned and was coincidental. She also stated that the court’s workload has increased. The Board did not change its decision. Kirby will not get the raise.

In other action:

A Walking Trail Ribbon Cutting Ceremony will be held in early October. Signs will be erected asking people using the trail to park at Heyworth-Mason Park or Sullivan Park. They are not allowed to park at the Route 22 trail entrance/exit point. Click here to see the Walking Trail Brochure.

The council voted to purchase and install a security camera for the front of the Town Hall from Security Concepts at a cost of $533.73.

Supervisor Glushko reported that the interest rate to finance several major projects would be less than expected. The Town will issue a 22-year bond in the amount of $1,072,561 at an interest rate of 3.39% to finance $330,336 for Hurricane Irene related repairs, $180,000 for the Highway Department roof repairs, $301,225 for the Fuller Road bridge replacement and $261,000 for the Walking Trail.

A public hearing is scheduled on Thursday, September 4th at 6:30 p.m. regarding the transfer of the Charter Communications franchise agreement to Comcast Inc.

Comments

Comment from DAVID C KIRBY
Time October 1, 2014 at 10:25 am

Hello Mr. Ryan,
I would like to point out to you, for clarification, that according to the Uniform Civil Rules For The Justice Courts part 214.2{b}. ” Each court shall establish the days and times when it shall sit in regular session. Such days and times shall be subject to modification by the Chief Administrator of the Courts. The court’s schedule as so established shall be filed with the clerk of the municipality, shall be posted where other official notices are posted and shall be filed with the law enforcement agencies regularly appearing in the court. The clerk’s office shall be open at hours established by each court, subject to the further order of the Chief Administrator”.
I believe the Town Board has either, taken the wrong position on this, or has ignored the proper procedures. It is not up to the board and its’ members to control the court.
If you looked into the Association of Towns, and the Unified Court Systems websites, there are also procedures in place to deal with resigning Justices . This board has ignored, or are ignorant of, these procedures. The board should have appointed Mr. Cabana, as per Judge Lawliss’ recommendation and followed the correct guidelines provided by the OCA.
Had they done so, then the whole increase of pay for Judge Kirby would not have become an issue.
It worries me as a taxpayer of this town that we have a board who are, collectively, so woefully, or perhaps willfully, misinformed of their duties. I think you may have been correct when you stated at the Aug 25th meeting that there seems to be an”underlying agenda”.

I would like to thank you for your time.
Keep up the good work